|
|
(*) I didnt realize that was debatable. Whats the M stand for? Maybe we
should take this argument to another venue?
|
TECHNIC building uses the module or M as a measurement of length. 1 M is
the distance from the center of one hole on a TECHNIC beam to the center of the
next hole.
So a 3 L studless beam is actually 2M
Steve
|
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Stump Dunn wrote:
|
|
(*) I didnt realize that was debatable. Whats the M stand for? Maybe we
should take this argument to another venue?
|
TECHNIC building uses the module or M as a measurement of length. 1 M is
the distance from the center of one hole on a TECHNIC beam to the center of
the next hole.
So a 3 L studless beam is actually 2M
Steve
|
Ugh. Is that metric? And you only count center-to-center, not the ends?
Leave it Lego to think of something like this.
|
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Timothy P. Smith wrote:
|
In lugnet.technic, Stump Dunn wrote:
|
|
(*) I didnt realize that was debatable. Whats the M stand for? Maybe we
should take this argument to another venue?
|
TECHNIC building uses the module or M as a measurement of length. 1 M
is the distance from the center of one hole on a TECHNIC beam to the center
of the next hole.
So a 3 L studless beam is actually 2M
Steve
|
Ugh. Is that metric? And you only count center-to-center, not the ends?
Leave it Lego to think of something like this.
|
That can not be true. For example, if you look at page three of the lego
factory technic section, what we call a 1x3 liftarm thin is described as 3M.
--Peter
|
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Stump Dunn wrote:
> Dont shoot the messenger!
Hmm. That would seem to imply that a 1x3 thin liftarm is, indeed, 3M long. Yes,
"M" is defined as the distance between two hole centers, but the length of the
piece can be cleanly read off the graph behind it - 3M.
--
Brian Davis
|
|
|