Subject:
|
Re: mini quad
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:35:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4981 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Sigurd van Strakenburg wrote:
> this is just a small fun project to see how small a pneumatic quad could be
> so i take all the room taking thinks out (swiches)
> and use the small piston's
>
> the swiches to make a schema work are outside the body and are just linked to
> the pistons in the body. a problem was the front/back movement from the legs.
> the *control* piston had to less friction so the legs dont make it to the back
> or the front, so i have linked them togeter (front ones and back ones) and take
> a swich that is hard to swich :)
Are you adding the extra switch just to slow the control pistons down?
I can't wait to see the movie.
You know that now I'm going to have to see how small a one I can make. :^)
>
> i have a movie as well but not at brickshelf so if you want to see it in action
> just mail at sigurd18@hotmail.com
>
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=152083
>
> have fun
>
> sigurd
Kev
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: mini quad
|
| (...) i did not add a extra switch, i just take a swich that is hard to swich (one swich but just a tough one) and yes its only to slow it down. i did not have so much small pistons to dubbel up. :( (...) movie is on his way :-D (...) haha oke cant (...) (19 years ago, 2-Nov-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | mini quad
|
| this is just a small fun project to see how small a pneumatic quad could be so i take all the room taking thinks out (swiches) and use the small piston's the swiches to make a schema work are outside the body and are just linked to the pistons in (...) (19 years ago, 1-Nov-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
