| |
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:50:13 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
> You know, I've always wondered why I like RotJ the least of the trilogy, and I
> think you've hit it! Just think if half the movie was used attacking the 2nd
> Death Star.
:)
Nah, that would have been too too derivative (having another Death Star was
already too derivative).
What if they had taken the Death Star planet-killer weapon, and put it on a
*much* smaller platform (instead of an even bigger platform)? These might
have been 10Km long, but only 1 KM wide. Kind of like the ultimate weapon
from Star Trek (I don't remember the episode name, sorry). Anyway, the
imperials could have started establishing a production facility for these
monsters, and the Alliance would have had to destroy. They would succeed
after a hard-fought battle, with the unfortunate loss of the Endor moon,
and all of those wacky, loveable Ewoks would have been fried to a crisp.
And Timmy was visiting the tree city at the time!
Steve
|
|
| |
In lugnet.starwars, Steve Bliss writes:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:50:13 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
> <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
>
> > You know, I've always wondered why I like RotJ the least of the trilogy, and • I
> > think you've hit it! Just think if half the movie was used attacking the 2nd
> > Death Star.
>
> :)
>
> Nah, that would have been too too derivative (having another Death Star was
> already too derivative).
>
> What if they had taken the Death Star planet-killer weapon, and put it on a
> *much* smaller platform (instead of an even bigger platform)? These might
> have been 10Km long, but only 1 KM wide. Kind of like the ultimate weapon
> from Star Trek (I don't remember the episode name, sorry). Anyway, the
> imperials could have started establishing a production facility for these
> monsters, and the Alliance would have had to destroy. They would succeed
> after a hard-fought battle, with the unfortunate loss of the Endor moon,
> and all of those wacky, loveable Ewoks would have been fried to a crisp.
> And Timmy was visiting the tree city at the time!
I whole heartedly agree. How come the Ewoks got there own movie but no other
cooler aliens did?
>
> Steve
|
|
| |
Would you guys stop picking on the Ewoks :) Wicket was my second
favorite character. They got 1/2 of a movie because George Lucas
wanted to give them 1/2 the movie, duh :)
Ryan
"Build or build not. There is no try." - Lego Master Yoda
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 4/20/99, at 8:44 PM, Ryan Carr wrote:
> In lugnet.starwars, Steve Bliss writes:
> > On Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:50:13 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
> > <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
> >
> > > You know, I've always wondered why I like RotJ the least of the trilogy, and • I
> > > think you've hit it! Just think if half the movie was used attacking the 2nd
> > > Death Star.
> >
> > :)
> >
> > Nah, that would have been too too derivative (having another Death Star was
> > already too derivative).
> >
> > What if they had taken the Death Star planet-killer weapon, and put it on a
> > *much* smaller platform (instead of an even bigger platform)? These might
> > have been 10Km long, but only 1 KM wide. Kind of like the ultimate weapon
> > from Star Trek (I don't remember the episode name, sorry). Anyway, the
> > imperials could have started establishing a production facility for these
> > monsters, and the Alliance would have had to destroy. They would succeed
> > after a hard-fought battle, with the unfortunate loss of the Endor moon,
> > and all of those wacky, loveable Ewoks would have been fried to a crisp.
> > And Timmy was visiting the tree city at the time!
>
> I whole heartedly agree. How come the Ewoks got there own movie but no other
> cooler aliens did?
> >
> > Steve
|
|
| |
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:00:13 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:50:13 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
> <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
>
> > You know, I've always wondered why I like RotJ the least of the trilogy, and I
> > think you've hit it! Just think if half the movie was used attacking the 2nd
> > Death Star.
>
> :)
>
> Nah, that would have been too too derivative (having another Death Star was
> already too derivative).
>
> What if they had taken the Death Star planet-killer weapon, and put it on a
> *much* smaller platform (instead of an even bigger platform)? These might
> have been 10Km long, but only 1 KM wide. Kind of like the ultimate weapon
> from Star Trek (I don't remember the episode name, sorry). Anyway, the
> imperials could have started establishing a production facility for these
> monsters, and the Alliance would have had to destroy. They would succeed
> after a hard-fought battle, with the unfortunate loss of the Endor moon,
> and all of those wacky, loveable Ewoks would have been fried to a crisp.
> And Timmy was visiting the tree city at the time!
Then everybody could have sat around celebrating and eating fried Ewok.
A universally known delicacy.
-- Terry K --
|
|
|
