 | | | | | | |
| |
|
In lugnet.space, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > In lugnet.space, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > > > In lugnet.space, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > > > In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > > > > > In lugnet.space, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Richie: Nice contest entry but I don't think it will win.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well that's a pretty safe bet, given it's ineligible. Go check the rules again.
> > > > >
> > > > > The rules to what, Ross? What contest are *you* referring to?
> > > >
> > > > LOL Larry, you know exactly which one I'm referring to, AND why I'm not gonna
> > > > post a link here.
> > >
> > > No, really, I don't have any idea what contest you're referring to. I infer you
> > > have an actual one in mind
> >
> > Just as I inferred the same from your statement "Richie: Nice contest entry but
> > I don't think it will win"???? Larry you can't have it both ways.
>
> It's pretty clear that there is one though from your words, unlike mine, which
> were just a turn of phrase.
OK, fine, I apologise for not being as well-read as you, and never having seen
or heard that phrase before, or anything like it, except in relation to a REAL
contest. I don't see my words are any more "clear" about the subject than yours.
ROSCO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote:
> OK, fine, I apologise for not being as well-read as you, and never having seen
> or heard that phrase before, or anything like it, except in relation to a REAL
> contest. I don't see my words are any more "clear" about the subject than yours.
Unclear? Let's review...
"Go check the rules again"
" LOL Larry, you know exactly which one I'm referring to, AND why I'm not gonna
post a link here."
Seems pretty clear that you know about this contest, whatever it is, to me!
There *is* some contest somewhere which you know about, (and which you thought I
know about too and assumed I was referring to), but which you're not willing,
for whatever reason, to talk about.
Is that true or false? And if you're not willing to talk about it, why not?
Because, honestly, I DON'T know about it, and I don't know why you wouldn't want
to share it with everyone. Most contests are fun.
How many times do I need to ask that question before you answer it instead of
dodging away on side trails? I'm guessing it's on JLUG, based on nothing other
than a hunch really, (I don't read JLUG much any more, after the BDSM contest
and Richie's troll entry in that one...) I would gladly admit I'm wrong if you
would but explain yourself.
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here, aren't I? Just answer the
question... what is this mysterious contest, or, what is it that makes you not
want to explain about it?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.space, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote:
>
> > OK, fine, I apologise for not being as well-read as you, and never having seen
> > or heard that phrase before, or anything like it, except in relation to a REAL
> > contest. I don't see my words are any more "clear" about the subject than yours.
>
> Unclear? Let's review...
>
> "Go check the rules again"
>
> " LOL Larry, you know exactly which one I'm referring to, AND why I'm not gonna
> post a link here."
Unclear? Let's review...
"Richie: Nice contest entry but I don't think it will win."
ROSCO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote:
> >
> > > OK, fine, I apologise for not being as well-read as you, and never having seen
> > > or heard that phrase before, or anything like it, except in relation to a REAL
> > > contest. I don't see my words are any more "clear" about the subject than yours.
> >
> > Unclear? Let's review...
> >
> > "Go check the rules again"
> >
> > " LOL Larry, you know exactly which one I'm referring to, AND why I'm not gonna
> > post a link here."
>
> Unclear? Let's review...
>
> "Richie: Nice contest entry but I don't think it will win."
Asked and answered. Multiple times in fact. One more time: It's a turn of
phrase.
On the other hand, what I asked you (which you cut away, again... why is that???
why keep cutting stuff away, what are you trying to hide??) remains unanswered:
What contest?
Why won't you say what it is?
I'm done.
I think it's pretty clear that you are dodging, and one could infer that you are
dodging because you know it's not going to make you look good. One could, but
one shouldn't. I prefer to give you the benefit of the doubt, there must be some
other reason.
But I'm done, I gave you multiple chances to answer but you won't.
I've demonstrated what I wanted to, which is this: even when I ask you a simple
question, you can't or won't answer it but prefer to dodge around.
Whatever.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.space, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote:
> >
> > Unclear? Let's review...
> >
> > "Richie: Nice contest entry but I don't think it will win."
>
> Asked and answered. Multiple times in fact.
Ummmm I only see once, but who's counting??????
ROSCO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > >
> > > Unclear? Let's review...
> > >
> > > "Richie: Nice contest entry but I don't think it will win."
> >
> > Asked and answered. Multiple times in fact.
>
> Ummmm I only see once, but who's counting??????
>
> ROSCO
You guys are idiots....cap yourselves immediately for crimes vs. humanity. I
think the Space Nazis need to take both of you away.
First they came for Larry and nobody cared.
Then they came for Rosco and nobody cared.
Then they came for me...and gave me $5 and a medal for selling them out.
-Keith (whistling "It's springtime for Hitler")
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.space, Keith Goldman wrote:
> Then they came for me...and gave me $5 and a medal for selling them out.
Only $5.00 ??? Dude, you should have held out for more. But I guess it's hard to
get a good price for idiots these days... so congrats for that.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.space, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Ross Crawford wrote (quoting Larry):
> > "Richie: Nice contest entry but I don't think it will win."
>
> Asked and answered. Multiple times in fact. One more time: It's a turn of
> phrase.
Is it? It's certainly not a common one. Googling the phrase yields nothing, but
that might just be reflecting my lack of googling skills. Perhaps you could
point some uses of that 'turn of phrase' prior to your using it in this thread?
Perhaps you did coin the phrase, and if you did, that's cool, but it is a bit
unfair to expect others to realise it.
And why is this still in .space? I've directed FUT to .o-t.debate, but I'm no
expert in such matters.
Cheers
Richie Dulin
| | | | | | |
