Subject:
|
Re: New MOC: Orbital Manipulator Craft
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:25:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1011 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Ley Ward wrote:
| |
But, seriously, your point (and Larry’s) re: tiles is well taken, though I
believe there is a way to use tiles judiciously and effectively. Your OMC is
a fine example of ‘just the essentials’ and it all appears very functional.
Those ‘fingers’ on the main arm are pure genius. I just worry that the pilot
might inadvertently try to scratch his head. Ouch.
|
Thanks. I’ve wanted a spacegoing crane for a long time now, and this the result
of all that waiting.
I worded my original post badly, but essentially I was trying to say that I
don’t think studlessness is all it’s cracked up to be. Form form form, that’s
what makes a cool MOC, IMHO.
| |
Anyway, nice work and don’t let the sheepnorks at it.
|
I can tell I’ll be sorry I ever thought of those. I already am, come to think of
it.
Soren
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New MOC: Orbital Manipulator Craft
|
| (...) I'm with you on that. If I may sum it up: Just build and let the studs fall where they may (or may not.) (...) Ah, but there is no (URL) 'undo'>(1) button, alas. But, if you hadn't, someone else may well have. Peace and un-undo, Professor (...) (20 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New MOC: Orbital Manipulator Craft
|
| (...) Um, I think that you've had class for quite some time, not just 'tomorrow' ;-), sorry, couldn't resist... But, seriously, your point (and Larry's) re: tiles is well taken, though I believe there is a way to use tiles judiciously and (...) (20 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
