| |
In lugnet.space, Steve Burge writes:
> One of the thing that really annoys me about most CCGs is
> that you can only have two players
Steve, that's not true. Most rules are indeed set up in the
"two-player" frame of mind, as was M:TG, but this is where creativity comes
in. We used to play Magic with tables full of people, sometimes in a
pattern (you could only attack those to either side), sometimes free-f'rall.
Some of our best times were like that. We also had 1 on 1 tourneys
together, with the "all-of-us" game being the tourney itself.
You're only limited, as with playing with Lego bricks, to your
imagination. A game using Lego pieces could be just as creative, and should
be just as infinitely different for each of us, as is a really good CCG,
which I think makes a great model for a game of this sort.
Peace and Long Life,
Tony Alexander
|
|
| |
Every game needs a good working title, so considering the thread which
started this off, how about the Portable Patented Plastic Building Brick Bot
game? P3B3 for short?
James
|
|
|
