|
In lugnet.robotics, Ross Crawford wrote:
|
In lugnet.robotics, Chio Siong Soh wrote:
|
Its performance is degraded compared to the earlier motor (#71427). The only
advantage seems to be its lighter weight.
|
Im guessing it may also be cheaper / easier to manufacture.
ROSCO
|
I burned out two of these motors in a high-torque situation (my Great Ball
Contraption module prototype) which I posted about
here and
here.
I dont like them for their friction, their louder sound, and that they feel
cheaper than the originals (weight, mostly).
|
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Jordan Bradford wrote:
|
I burned out two of these motors in a high-torque situation (my Great Ball
Contraption module prototype) which I posted about
here and
here.
|
What a relief to know Im not jinxed after all.
|
I dont like them for their friction, their louder sound, and that they
feel cheaper than the originals (weight, mostly).
|
And their high mortality rate.
I hope the proper person at TLC is looking into it.
C S Soh
|
|
|