 | | BrickJournal (was Re: A new project...) —Joe Strout
|
| | | (...) Just as another data point, I don't agree -- I read it cover-to-cover and while I did know some of the content already, much of it was new, and it was all enjoyable reading. Best, Joe (19 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: BrickJournal (was Re: A new project...) —Joe Meno
|
| | | | (...) Thanks, Joe! One of the challenges BrickJournal faces is trying to stay timely, given that I am making this quarterly. Because of the lengthy period between issues and the nature of the typical AFOL (wanting to find out things that are (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jun-05, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: BrickJournal (was Re: A new project...) —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | (...) You do have the advantage of an inside line to the company though. Those are the bits I found most interesting. Stuff on the development of themes and models would be fascinating. (...) That would be super. The stuff on actual building was (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jun-05, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: BrickJournal (was Re: A new project...) —Joe Meno
|
| | | | (...) It's funny that you mention that, because there will be some upcoming articles from LEGO staffers... (...) There will be some more instructions this issue..and some more Bricks for Thought! (...) (19 years ago, 30-Aug-05, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal, FTX)
|
| | | | |
