| |
In lugnet.pirates, Franklin W. Cain writes:
> In lugnet.pirates, Alex Marino writes:
> > Conquestadors(spelling?)
>
> Close... it's "Conquistadors". ;-)
Isn't that "Conquistadores"? 8^)
Dave!
FUT: off-topic.anal.languages
|
|
| |
In lugnet.pirates, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.pirates, Franklin W. Cain writes:
> > In lugnet.pirates, Alex Marino writes:
>
> > > Conquestadors(spelling?)
> >
> > Close... it's "Conquistadors". ;-)
>
> Isn't that "Conquistadores"? 8^)
>
> Dave!
>
> FUT: off-topic.anal.languages
Either is correct.
Bruce
(back in pirates where this belongs)
:-)
|
|
| |
In lugnet.pirates, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > > > Conquestadors(spelling?)
> > >
> > > Close... it's "Conquistadors". ;-)
> >
> > Isn't that "Conquistadores"? 8^)
> > FUT: off-topic.anal.languages
>
> Either is correct.
I know, I know--I'm just giving Franklin a hard time.
In any case, of far greater importance to me (though still not much) is
why otherwise right-thinking people pronounce nuclear as "nukular". What's
that about?
Dave!
> (back in pirates where this belongs)
(back into FUN where it belongs again, or maybe geek?) 8^)
|
|
|
