To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 13050
    Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title) —Derek Raycraft
   (...) At the ever increasing rate I see the 7 words get used around here (Lugnet in general, rtlT has been clean) I'm surprised to hear that anyone has gotten banned. If something that obvious doesn't get you a time out I don't know what does. Well (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
   
        Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title) —Larry Pieniazek
   (...) It depends on which 7 words you mean. I have seen a number of words used here in rtlT that I personally do think are inappropriate. (...) It is not the current policy to comment on who has or hasn't been given a timeout (a timeout is different (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
   
        Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title) —Derek Raycraft
     (...) > (...) Type "7 words" into google and hit I'm Feeling Lucky. Google knows what I'm talking about. Google knows all. (...) This seems to lead to: -people like me feeling nothing is being done -people like Chris feeling they are being abused (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
    
         Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title) —Larry Pieniazek
     (...) I know which ones you mean too. But I'll say that I personally don't like the milder ones either, I think they show lack of imagination. I am in the minority on the Admin team, so A-- gets a pass and B---- seems to fit the sitch, and S--- gets (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
   
        Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title) —Steve Bliss
   (...) You've spent too much time dealing with NDAs. Seriously, did you agree to not discuss whether or not, in general terms, timeouts had been handed down? No, wait -- you wouldn't be able to discuss whether you agreed to not discuss it. Sheesh. (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
   
        Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title) —Larry Pieniazek
   (...) No I didn't. In fact I already said elsewhere that some had. And, it's causing some very unfortunate confusion: (URL) ... someone has made an invalid assumption there, and forgotten that we don't censor, we can only request cancels which users (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR