To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28535
     
   
Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:10:51 GMT
Viewed: 
6228 times
  

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
Here are a few new JLUG slogans....

JLUG - The end of an error.... errr I mean era.
JLUG - Been there, done that, cant be bothered to do it again.
JLUG - The "sandbox" is condemned.

Good night,
Janey "Red Brick"

Well, thanks for the kind words everyone, for a forum that never expected to
reach 19 members we did ok. But it was time to call it a day. The other parts of
jlug.net will remain for the time being, it may even get updated occasionally.
Wink.

And I'd just like to take this opportunity to give a big thank you and hug to
Janey, who was not only the instigator of our little sandbox, but also a great
friend. Then again, everyone that really matters already knows that. And no
Chris, you WEREN'T member #2 and I have PROOF of that. Have a great time at
Brickworld, you 2.

But one thing I don't understand - why did you post this in .debate????? I
haven't seen one iota of debate in this thread yet...

ROSCO

   
         
     
Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:27:34 GMT
Viewed: 
6304 times
  

--snip--

But one thing I don't understand - why did you post this in .debate????? I
haven't seen one iota of debate in this thread yet...

I disagree with that.

ROSCO

Tim

    
          
      
Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:09:42 GMT
Viewed: 
6504 times
  

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
--snip--

But one thing I don't understand - why did you post this in .debate????? I
haven't seen one iota of debate in this thread yet...

I disagree with that.

ROSCO

Tim

This post is flawed.

Bryce

     
           
      
Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:40:48 GMT
Viewed: 
6527 times
  

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bryce McGlone wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:

   This post is flawed.

Bryce

No doubt because of Dagger Guy.

Farewell, JLUG! We’ll miss ya.

Cheers!
“Big Daddy” Nelson

    
          
     
Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:19:55 GMT
Viewed: 
6453 times
  

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
--snip--

But one thing I don't understand - why did you post this in .debate????? I
haven't seen one iota of debate in this thread yet...

I disagree with that.

ROSCO

Tim

Says you.

Ley

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:16:52 GMT
Viewed: 
6294 times
  

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
   But one thing I don’t understand - why did you post this in .debate?????

Seems to me its the one place on Lugnet that all Journeymen could be guaranteed to read sooner or later.

Very sad tidings gang. But the fact that its gone does not diminish how much I loved it, which was a lot. Thanks.

Oh, and just once more, because it always tickled me that I could, My name is Chris.

Richard
Still baldly going...
Port Block

 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR