To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26990
26989  |  26991
Subject: 
Re: Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:50:32 GMT
Viewed: 
1930 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

   Supposedly common wisdom is that Bush may get to appoint as many as 3 new Supremes. I’m scared at the very idea of that!

May I present Justices Ashcroft, Moore, and Brown.

Dave!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
 
(...) Reason this month had an interesting series of articles about the Supremes. Stuff analysing their work, and asking people to predect who MIGHT be nominated and who the person asked liked, as well as favorite past justices... fascinating stuff. (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR