Subject:
|
Re: More Election Bad News?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:20:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1558 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
> Actually, the church has no authority to issue legally binding licenses of any
> sort, except insofar as the church is empowered to do so by the state.
Licenses? Or just recognition of contracts? The state ought not to be granting
licenses of this sort, merely recognizing contracts. (or in the case of non
consenting or non adult, NOT recognizing)
This is an example of the more general question... when and where do you have
standing to file a civil suit?
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: More Election Bad News?
|
| (...) The whole license thing is probably, in part at least, a throwback to the days when you had to get blood tests to ensure blood-type compatibility before they'd allow you to get married. Ironically, that's an issue that wouldn't matter at all (...) (20 years ago, 3-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: More Election Bad News?
|
| (...) While I mostly agree with you Larry, are we ready to open this box? If we agree that government should not interfere with any type of "Union" are we ready to accept the full repercussions of that decision. The immediate effect would be the (...) (20 years ago, 3-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More Election Bad News?
|
| (...) What about this: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
