| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> Just like I'm tempted to start a poll asking whether there should be a
> disclaimer on all polls similar to slashdot:
>
> * Don't complain about lack of options. You've got to pick a few when you do
> multiple choice. Those are the breaks.
> * This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers,
> dynamic IPs, firewalls. If you're using these numbers to do anything
> important, you're insane.
How about a poll like this:
Are LUGNET polls generally flawed, scientifically unsound, more likely to
annoy others than come up with serious answers, and usually have at least
one obvious omission?
[ ] No
Cheers
Richie
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Poll
|
| (...) Just like I'm tempted to start a poll asking whether there should be a disclaimer on all polls similar to slashdot: * Don't complain about lack of options. You've got to pick a few when you do multiple choice. Those are the breaks. * This (...) (21 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
