 | | Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Jon Furman
|
| | | Anthony, I 'm posting because I was the person that possibly branded you a complainer. I'd like you to read this whole post objectively, so I'd like to offer my apology in advance, hoping that you'll see a few things differently, and continue to be (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Anthony Sava
|
| | | | (...) I must also offer my own apologies to everyone at Lugnet. Though I do not plan to continue to post regularly, it was wrong of me to say that everyone here attributes to Lugnet's problem. However, that does not remove the fact that Lugnet still (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | (...) Then grow up and deal with it, you're wrong. Do you actually believe that people MUST read all of your (or anyone's) posts, and comment on them, rather than "ignoring" them, or "looking over" them? GROW UP, the world owes you NOTHING, you (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | | "Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:3B22650A.FB6ABA...faq.com... (...) and crying (...) attention! So why you giving it to him? regards lawrence (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | To hopefully forestall the next person whining about noone paying attention to them. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | You know, I've tried to stay out of this, though I do have to say. Tom I would have thought better coming from you. Anthony wasn't 'whining' about being ignored, he was simply stating a fact that is very prevalent on this server. People get ignored. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) That's great advice. (...) Flaming cruxifixion? Seems a mixed metaphor... :-) Seriously, we've had some discussions about the phenomenon in the past. Lots of them. Is LUGNET cliqueish? It must be, I would think, unless it is unlike every other (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) Mookie, who has ever stabbed YOU in the back? I can't even fathom this happening...I presume you mean creatively, etc. And I DO recall your comments about castle walls -- but then again, haven't you been using MOC stickers on walls? I am going (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | "richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GEqDFD.FIt@lugnet.com... (...) You moving? -Tim (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | Mookie wrote: <snip> (...) Hi Tamyra, Actually I wouldn't have replied as the Tom's way, but my thoughts are pretty same about this kind of "cry baby attitude". Actually you already revealed the trick: "having a thicker skin". And not having great (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Mark de Kock
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Selçuk Göre writes: <snip> I assume (...) No you're not! ;-) And Tammy, by the looks of it, you didn't kill this thread either. Now it's my turn. /\/\ark - watching the 3724 watching him - de Kock (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
