|
In lugnet.mediawatch, Bryan Wong wrote:
> If the media's gonna throw around the term "Legos" on a regular basis, then the
> message at www.legos.com will never be heard, unfortunately.
Oops, just realized that www.legos.com simply redirects to the correct website
now. For those of you unaware, at one point, the incorrect URL resulted in a
site with a bit of a "brand speech" (i.e. how to use the LEGO name properly)
before being redirected...
-Bryan
|
|
|
In lugnet.mediawatch, Bryan Wong wrote:
> In lugnet.mediawatch, Bryan Wong wrote:
> > If the media's gonna throw around the term "Legos" on a regular basis, then the
> > message at www.legos.com will never be heard, unfortunately.
>
> Oops, just realized that www.legos.com simply redirects to the correct website
> now. For those of you unaware, at one point, the incorrect URL resulted in a
> site with a bit of a "brand speech" (i.e. how to use the LEGO name properly)
> before being redirected...
>
> -Bryan
Yes, probably taken down due to a little 'backlash' from the masses--
http://customerevangelists.typepad.com/blog/2005/09/you_say_lego_we.html
and that was just a site I found right off the bat!
I will always endeavour to type 'LEGO bricks' and say the same.
However, I will not tell people that they're making transgressions because they
say 'legos'. It's their choice, whether the person is a poster on LUGNET or a
newspapwer reporter.
Dave K
|
|
|