Subject:
|
Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.appraisal
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 04:06:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1926 times
|
| |
|
|
<snipped it all>
Very good informative read, Rick. Reminds me of sports card grading
systems. I think it'd be cool to get into the habit of using something like
this; maybe a bit looser standards, but pretty close to.
-Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
| (...) Any constructive criticism in developing these grading standards is very much appreciated -- so thanks, Chris, for responding at all! The more voices I hear the better I can improve the standards and hopefully arrive at something that many (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
| Hey Y'all: I could use some feedback on the following. Please do not reply to me personally at my email address, but rather reply here so that others may take part in the discussion over the issues that may arise. Thanks in advance, Hop-Frog (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
