To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / 3778
     
   
Subject: 
Re: The Future of Trains
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:11:26 GMT
Viewed: 
38226 times
  

In lugnet.lego, Brian Davis wrote:
In lugnet.lego, Philippe Hurbain wrote:

A practical value is about 1A - NXT motor driver itself
limits the current around 1A too.

Ah, thank you - so running two stalled train motors would exceed the NXT output,
but running one train motor up to a stall conditions should be fine. Out of
curiosity, along with the output limitations on the NXT (1 A) and RCX (500 mA),
does anyone have the output limitations (voltage and current) on the train
transformer?

The linear regulator inside is a 1.5A version if I remember well, but I may be
wrong. Cross posted to lugnet.trains trying to get train guru opinion...

Philo

   
         
     
Subject: 
Re: The Future of Trains
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:41:46 GMT
Viewed: 
39154 times
  

In lugnet.lego, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
In lugnet.lego, Brian Davis wrote:
In lugnet.lego, Philippe Hurbain wrote:

A practical value is about 1A - NXT motor driver itself
limits the current around 1A too.

Ah, thank you - so running two stalled train motors would exceed the NXT output,
but running one train motor up to a stall conditions should be fine. Out of
curiosity, along with the output limitations on the NXT (1 A) and RCX (500 mA),
does anyone have the output limitations (voltage and current) on the train
transformer?

The linear regulator inside is a 1.5A version if I remember well, but I may be
wrong. Cross posted to lugnet.trains trying to get train guru opinion...

Philo

At BayLTC we usually run four train motors on one loop using stock Controller
with a 1.2 amp wall wart.

Bruce

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: The Future of Trains
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 8 Oct 2007 22:03:39 GMT
Viewed: 
40016 times
  

In lugnet.lego, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
In lugnet.lego, Brian Davis wrote:
In lugnet.lego, Philippe Hurbain wrote:

A practical value is about 1A - NXT motor driver itself
limits the current around 1A too.

Ah, thank you - so running two stalled train motors would exceed the NXT output,
but running one train motor up to a stall conditions should be fine. Out of
curiosity, along with the output limitations on the NXT (1 A) and RCX (500 mA),
does anyone have the output limitations (voltage and current) on the train
transformer?

The linear regulator inside is a 1.5A version if I remember well, but I may be
wrong. Cross posted to lugnet.trains trying to get train guru opinion...

The Australian LEGO wall wart is marked 10V @ 7VA on the secondary. I don't
recall all the stuff I learnt about the relationship between VA and W, but that
seems to me to indicate about 0.7A. I believe this generally reduces as load
increases, but again I don't recall all that stuff... Philo?

M>ltc uses a home-built 3A transformer for our displays.

ROSCO

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: The Future of Trains
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:27:19 GMT
Viewed: 
39288 times
  

The Australian LEGO wall wart is marked 10V @ 7VA on the secondary. I don't
recall all the stuff I learnt about the relationship between VA and W, but that
seems to me to indicate about 0.7A. I believe this generally reduces as load
increases, but again I don't recall all that stuff... Philo?

You are right, the main limitation probably comes from wall wart... You are
essentially right for the 0.7A current (though it is not hard limit, rather a
safety one).

Philo

 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR