Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Brickshelf?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:02:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4852 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Paul Baulch wrote:
| |
In lugnet.general, Jon Palmer wrote:
| |
Everyone else, get on Flickr.
|
No, Flickr is a load of garbage. It’s way, way slower to load than just about
any other image-hosting site I’ve ever used, it has crap size restrictions on
the actual image presentations for no reason other than it wants to maintain
a “site look”, which, frankly, is totally unnecessary for an image-hosting
site, and it tempts users to add pointless fluff that tends to hinder rather
than help examination of images.
People should try Maj, or Yesalbum, or Photobucket, or google for “image
hosting” if they don’t like those, but for the love of all that is sane in
this world DON’T use Flickr.
|
Yeah, so maybe our Flickr experiences are very different. I love the site.
I’ve loved it since it first came out. The interface is clean, the commenting
and annotation system is outstanding and etc etc etc. It has about a dozen good
features that probably could have been implemented on Brickshelf years ago.
Don’t use Maj. It has the same antiquated file system and structure that
Brickshelf had and unless Kevin gets on here and says otherwise, I anticipate it
will disappear too. And Photobucket? You gotta be kiddin me.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Problems with Brickshelf?
|
| (...) No, Flickr is a load of garbage. It's way, way slower to load than just about any other image-hosting site I've ever used, it has crap size restrictions on the actual image presentations for no reason other than it wants to maintain a "site (...) (17 years ago, 15-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
