 | | | | | |
In lugnet.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> Easier to pronounce is a good thing. Now all we need is one that is easier
> to pronounce than MOC (which apparently some people called "mock" and others
> call M-O-C).
"mock" is already a word, so I propose we pronounce it like "smoke" and "choke"
~Kevoh
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> > Easier to pronounce is a good thing. Now all we need is one that is easier
> > to pronounce than MOC (which apparently some people called "mock" and others
> > call M-O-C).
>
> "mock" is already a word, so I propose we pronounce it like "smoke" and "choke"
>
> ~Kevoh
I could write:
AFOL whose LEGOs are MOC'ed
And my spell check gives:
A fool whose legs are mocked.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
| |
In lugnet.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
| |
Easier to pronounce is a good thing. Now all we need is one that is easier
to pronounce than MOC (which apparently some people called “mock” and others
call M-O-C).
|
“mock” is already a word, so I propose we pronounce it like “smoke” and
“choke”
|
Moke is also already a word, its a type of open
Mini
tim
| | | | | | |
