|
In lugnet.general, Alfred Speredelozzi wrote:
> I agree with your suggestions. In fact, I think it helps cut down the trash on
> Lugnet becuase you have to be registered to post, AND Lugnet always shows your
> real name.
I think there's a HUGE amount of merit in that. Sites that allow handles just
aren't as pleasant, everything else being equal, in my view
>
> Yea, we still get trash (and different people will judge what is trash
> differently), but it is not nearly as lame as this BOBO character.
>
> I really like MOCpages, too, but yea wouldn't it be great if there could be some
> controls on what was thrown into the comments.
Yes, Perhaps only allow registered users to comment for starters. Maybe even
require a donation too before you can comment.
That does bring up a question, though... who are the comments for and what
purpose do they serve? Allowing a lot of commenters means you get more comments.
Restricting who can comment may get you less comments.
I like to think I build for myself (and my customers, I guess) rather than
random passersby.
I totally have no idea where the FUT ought to go. Publish maybe? I dunno.
|
|
|
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Alfred Speredelozzi wrote:
> > I agree with your suggestions. In fact, I think it helps cut down the trash on
> > Lugnet becuase you have to be registered to post, AND Lugnet always shows your
> > real name.
>
> I think there's a HUGE amount of merit in that. Sites that allow handles just
> aren't as pleasant, everything else being equal, in my view
>
> >
> > Yea, we still get trash (and different people will judge what is trash
> > differently), but it is not nearly as lame as this BOBO character.
> >
> > I really like MOCpages, too, but yea wouldn't it be great if there could be some
> > controls on what was thrown into the comments.
>
> Yes, Perhaps only allow registered users to comment for starters. Maybe even
> require a donation too before you can comment.
At least registered users, with a real name. A donation will sort out a lot
more than I would want, I think.
> That does bring up a question, though... who are the comments for and what
> purpose do they serve? Allowing a lot of commenters means you get more comments.
> Restricting who can comment may get you less comments.
Less comments is ok with me. There are only two comments I like for my MOCs:
- Simply positive messgaes "Gee that's great" or "Cool"
- Constructive and positive feedback
Even feedback that says "its uninspired, you can do better" is ok (I
actually got that one in person for a moonbase module I made).
I guess if someone is going to comment, it would be nice to know that they
actually cared. I don't know.
> I like to think I build for myself (and my customers, I guess) rather than
> random passersby.
Random Lego fans, sure I think I build for them as well as myself. Completely
random people (aside from Public Show attendees)... not so much.
> I totally have no idea where the FUT ought to go. Publish maybe? I dunno.
Publish sounds right.
-Alfred
|
|
|