Subject:
|
Re: Understanding Leaks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:24:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
524 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney writes:
> I would not consider the Marz Distribution site a leak, however, since no
> measures are taken to keep the information from the public. Obviously Marz
> buys from LEGO and sells to retailers, and if LEGO had a problem with the
> way Marz distributed images online they could stop them. So, if LEGO doesn't
> want the Marz photos online, it's their responsbility.
Well (I do not post this as an argument for or against in the discussion),
that seems to be exactly what has happened now. All sets not available to
the general public yet, have been taken off the Marz Distribution site.
With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) Hi Joe - I believe a dealer catalog, obtained by and scanned by an individual who is not a dealer and placed on the internet would constitute a leak. I recall being at LEGO's office in NYC a couple years ago and having to almost beg for a (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
