Subject:
|
Re: Understanding Leaks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:16:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
459 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney writes:
> Hi Joe -
> I believe a dealer catalog, obtained by and scanned by an individual who is
> not a dealer and placed on the internet would constitute a leak. I recall
> being at LEGO's office in NYC a couple years ago and having to almost beg
> for a dealer catalog (sitting on a stack on a shelf) and promise that I
> would not distribute the images, as they were not intended for public
> consumption. The guys at LEGO distribute information to dealers differently
> than they distribute to consumers. I assume they have a reasonable
> expectation that the dealers won't further distribute the info. From my
> point of view, I intend to respect LEGO's desire to keep information from
> the public if I ever run across it in a dealer catalog.
hm...hadn't thought of that. You're right. No wonder I got the confidentiality
form when I got my job:)
Joe Meno
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) Hi Joe - I believe a dealer catalog, obtained by and scanned by an individual who is not a dealer and placed on the internet would constitute a leak. I recall being at LEGO's office in NYC a couple years ago and having to almost beg for a (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
