 | | Re: A new scan for 371 (some proof?)
|
| (...) It's impossible. If we are talking about the 60's, only possible way to make this thing printed is huge offset printing machinery, which for sure owned by some other company that works for TLC, not the TLC itself. That is still true, paper (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: A new scan for 371 (some proof?)
|
| "Michael Huffman" <mhuffman@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:392592E1.D493EE...ing.com... (...) No need for an apology, I too meant no offense nor hostility. I was just making my stance clear, that's all :) (...) Which suggests that maybe they (...) (24 years ago, 19-May-00, to lugnet.general)
| |
