Subject:
|
Re: Cataolgs, Justus and Lego
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Dec 1999 04:43:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1635 times
|
| |
|
|
> that Huw decided to remove his excellent preview scans and that Kevin has to
> impose a ridiculous restriction against post 1997 set instructions on his
> web site. Lego ignores the AFOL community for decades, and now that they
> finally decide to start getting with it I suppose we all have to roll over
> and play dead.
The pre-1997 (or more specifically not in current retail assortment)
restriction on my website is not rediculous and definately _NOT_ imposed on
me. I have said this a thousand times privately and publicly. When I started
the site, outside of any official guidance from TLC (and I don't want any) I
made certain decisions regarding content and format. Those decisions were
based on common sense and were consistent with my desire to make a "good faith
effort" to not adversely affect TLC's interests. In fact the result has been
benificial for everyone involved.
You might even read Brad's latest post as permission to publish current
instruction scans. I'm surprised that everyone missed that significant point.
Regardless, it is still my policy to not publish scans of sets in the current
retail assortment, so I'm the "bad guy" on this issue, not TLC.
I am fully capable of dealing with any issues relating to brickshelf.com.
Please let me deal with them myself and don't ask TLC for anything related
to it.
KL
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Catalogs, Justus and Lego
|
| Kevin Loch wrote: <snip> (...) I did. See earlier post. (...) I didn't. (...) Kevin, in light of Brad's latest post, why continue your policy to not publish current instructions? Just wondering. -John (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | Re: Catalogs, Justus and Lego
|
| (...) I see "limited extracts." What are you seeing? Both of these words would seem to me to have the effect of reducing the scope of what should be published by anyone but LEGO -- and maybe even including old instructional booklets. When I read (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | Re: Cataolgs, Justus and Lego
|
| Kevin Loch wrote in message ... (...) to (...) started (...) I (...) faith (...) been (...) point. (...) current (...) That's fine. My point was that it's a shame there has to be any restriction at all. Why doesn't Lego get serious about supporting (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Cataolgs, Justus and Lego
|
| I have read and understand the policies regarding the scanning of catlaogs. I disagree with any policy purporting to restrict the scanning of any catalog, instruction, advertisement, photograph or any material that concerns any currently or (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
