 | | BrickWiki - time to move?
|
|
For anyone interested in the future of the (URL) BrickWiki> project please visit the new (URL) BrickWiki Blog> and join in the discussion of the need to move to a new server (or not). Thanks. (16 years ago, 7-Nov-08, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.db.brictionary, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tyre (tire) nomenclature
|
|
(...) Also lugnet.db.brictionary ;) (...) I support the idea of standardised names for tyres - I would probably vote for millimetres, as that would match better with the most of the ones molded by TLC. And I would further suggest that wheel (...) (18 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number for old Technic piston?
|
|
(...) Thanks, Ross. On the Parts Tracker, I've moved x849.dat to 3652.dat. Steve (20 years ago, 29-Oct-04, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number for old Technic piston?
|
|
Hello Steve "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@earthlink.net> schreef in bericht news:I6B07w.L2u@lugnet.com... (...) of the (...) sure. When checking your second link it does say 3652. So either someone has just corrected the test or you apparently made a (...) (20 years ago, 29-Oct-04, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number for old Technic piston?
|
|
(...) We appreciate the confirmation and notification. Technica has been corrected. Thanks, Clark Isodomos webmaster (20 years ago, 29-Oct-04, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number for old Technic piston?
|
|
(...) ROSCO (20 years ago, 29-Oct-04, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Part number for old Technic piston?
|
|
I'm doing a cross-check on a part number. Can anyone confirm the number of the older, square Technic piston? Peeron shows the number for this part as 3652: (URL) shows the number as 3562: (URL) seems likely that the number on Technica is a typo, but (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Clikit file naming
|
|
(...) Hmm ... I looked at that Peeron list, and it seems all the small Clikits bits are called 'icons.' Strange, but I've seen stranger [1]. When I look at the above three, I think female adapter, male adapter, and backing - cause those are the (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
(...) Hi Steve!.. How is it going since we last talk? Anyway, here are the names that I use in my personal database: Technic Brick Technic Half Beam Technic Half Beam Liftarm Technic Beam Technic Beam Liftarm Technic Beam Liftarm Double-Bent Which (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
(...) Two alternate thoughts (which I'm pretty sure have been mentioned before): 1. Stick with 'liftarm' for the half-width parts, and 'beam' for full-width parts. 2. Use 'liftarm' for parts with crossaxle holes, and 'beam' for parts with only (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
(...) Well the only problem that I have with that is that I don't think "beam" describes the short ones (1x2, 1x3) as well as "liftarm", (which I agree also isn't the perfect name). They are all basically the same shape, which is what I think led to (...) (20 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
(...) Yes, except that there is still nomeclature confusion elsewhere, some systems use Technic Bricks for the bricks with holes and some systems us Technic Beams, I believe. So I think the rounded designation is helpful. (...) except that the 1x2 (...) (20 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
(...) I'm not sure that rounded is needed. Brick vs. Beam is very clear. Besides for bricks the count is the number of studs (always even except for 1). For Beams it is the number of holes (typically an odd number, except in the case of 1x2.) Kevin (...) (20 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
Personally, I think the naming should be like this: For parts with axle holes, use the Liftarm designation e.g. Technic Liftarm 1 x 11.5 Double Bent for part 32009 and Technic Liftarm 1 x 3 Thin with Click Rotation Hinge Half Socket for part 41679 (...) (20 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
Not sure if this has been brought up before, but the naming of the technic liftarms leaves something to be desired. It seems mostly the thin ones have just the dimensions, thick ones have "straight" appended. Except for the 4L liftarms. Bricklink (...) (20 years ago, 27-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: part ID
|
|
Checking bricklinks collection of technic stickersheet pictures, I now know that its from the 8229. Regardless of where its from, its certainly a very nifty part :) In fact, many technic sets have nifty stickers :) (20 years ago, 23-Mar-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: part ID
|
|
(...) Could be from cockpit of the technic space shuttle 8480 [LEGOSet 8480] (20 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic, lugnet.db.brictionary, FTX)
|
| |
| | part ID
|
|
(URL) anyone know what the stickered part in this picture just in front of the minifig is? I like it and think its nifty but I really want to know where its from. I know the tile is genuine lego but mabie the sticker isnt... :) (20 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Clikit file naming
|
|
(...) Thanks for your comments - the names are just working titles for the present. I was really looking for opinions on whether the connector should be called a stud (as you do) and should have the inbuilt LDraw support for studs. I'm not sure the (...) (20 years ago, 15-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Clikit file naming
|
|
(...) it anyway. :-) All three of these parts are what TLC calls "Icons". (URL) (I think) should be named accordingly. The current name of clikit1 is particularly unfortunate because Clikits parts include at least one (small) human-sized ring. An (...) (20 years ago, 15-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
