| |
I am generally against new meta-commands, but inspired by "0 BFD INVERTNEXT",
how about something like "0 MIRRORING KEEPPOSITIVENEXT". The more accurate
syntax, I leave to the gurus...
/Tore
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> I am generally against new meta-commands, but inspired by "0 BFD INVERTNEXT",
> how about something like "0 MIRRORING KEEPPOSITIVENEXT". The more accurate
> syntax, I leave to the gurus...
We definitely don't want to do this. It's unnecessary, because the sign of the
determinant in the matrix specifying the sub-part tells you whether the sub-part
is mirrored. The above might allow the program to do less math, but that's not
an acceptable reason for introducing a meta-command that is susceptible to human
error. (Plus, in many cases the program will have calculated the determinant
for other reasons anyway.)
--Travis Cobbs
|
|
|
