 | | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ??? —Don Heyse
| | | | (...) I agree. I think the problem is that the current half cylinder primitives expect to be mated with other cylinder primitives to create a whole cylinder. Connect edge A with optional line to edge B without optional line. But connect edge A to (...) (22 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ??? —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) It took me a minute to grok what you were saying. The 'test line' is inaccurate for anything except joining one half-cylinder to another. (...) We could push the cylinder polygons into one file, the final edge-line into another file, and (...) (22 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ??? —Don Heyse
| | | | | (...) Do you have a naming convention in mind for the new un-deliminated partial cylinder files and the joiner files? How about X-Ycylu.dat for un-deliminated partial cylinders, X-Ycyla.dat for the leading optional line, and X-Ycylb.dat for a (...) (22 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ??? —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) I thought about it for like 2.5 seconds. Does that count? I figured it would be some X-YcylZ.dat type of thing. :) (...) X-Ycylu.dat works for me. (...) We should only need a single file for the optional line,[2] the leading and trailing edges (...) (22 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
