Subject:
|
Re: Questions about existing parts (making BFC)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:41:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
784 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.cad, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
>
> > After being out of buissiness for a while I continued to
> > make existing parts bfc compliant.
> >
> > Are all primitives already bfc compliant?
>
> No, but any new primitives or fixed primitives should be BFC'ed.
>
> > I thought someone was working on that, so I dont want to
> > spend time to do that over again.
> > Some primitives i have non bfc (only official updates):
> > * 2-8sphe
> > * 4-8sphe
> > * 2-4ring1
> > * stud3a
> > * arm1
>
> Of these, I think the only one we don't have a BFC'ed version of is
> arm1.
>
> Steve
We do have a BFC'd arm1.dat on the Parts Tracker.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Questions about existing parts (making BFC)
|
| (...) No, but any new primitives or fixed primitives should be BFC'ed. (...) Of these, I think the only one we don't have a BFC'ed version of is arm1. (...) I'll look forward to seeing these. Steve (21 years ago, 8-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
