Subject:
|
Re: The future of LDraw?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:41:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
20342 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
***snip***
I'd like to mention at this point that Tore Eriksson is personally responsible
for my first forays into apocryphal parts-authoring. I found his small handful
of Tyco-based half-height elements, and I thought "I can do that." I knew
nothing of the code, but I started by tweaking the placement of the stud.dat
primitives in a 2x4 half-height brick, and that was that.
After those humble beginnings, I was hooked. So you can blame Tore for the 1200
or so non-canonical parts that have followed.
Thanks, Tore!
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) It is an issue IMO. Probably a small one compared to other ones, but it's the sum of real or subjective obstacles that makes me worried about recruiting new LDraw authors. What I believe is the biggest issue is nobody's fault: All the easy, (...) (14 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
