To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 16643
  Re: LGPL Datsville
 
When loading the Datsville MPD file in MLCAD, it asks for two files that I can't find anywhere. 1. plnxzb.dat 2. 606p01b.dat Anyone know where I can find these, or how to resolve the issue? It also reports an error for "tmmayor.dat", but I think I (...) (14 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Tmmayor.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)  [DAT]
 
(...) Try this one, I don't know the status for it, and it looks a little wierd, but no errors. /Tore 0 Datsville Mayor 0 Name: Mlzmayor.ldr 0 Was: Tmmayor.dat 0 Author: Leonardo Zide 0 Unofficial Datsville Minifig Model 0 Parent: Bjvthall.ldr 0 (...) (14 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)  [DAT]
 
(...) Please tell me where the reference to plnxzb.dat is. (Parent file, line nr) /Tore 0 Datsville Baseplate 0 Name: 606p01b.dat 0 Author: John VanZwieten 0 Inlined:1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 606p01.dat 0 Baseplate 32 x 32 Road Straight with Road (...) (14 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) It's in town_full.dat, right after tbfire.dat. By the file name it sounds like a "plane" for the "X" and "Z" axes. So it probably was just used for orienting other models. Would it be safe to simply replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat? Mike (14 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) In fact, come to think of it, I probably added it myself when I was working with the file years ago! ;) Mike (14 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) Thanks, I'll have a look at it. (...) I'm not sure. Check if there'll be any color changes. It may have been inlined first, then color edited. But that sounds like an awkward way to go(?) If you see no color difference, just replace the (...) (14 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in the calling Type 1 line. /Tore (14 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) Is it an official part? Why isn't it included with the official distribution? Mike (14 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) After searching Peeron and BrickLink, I think that this is not a real LEGO part. There are more of them in Datsville. (...) If it is an existing LEGO part (which I tend to doubt), the .dat file may not have been submitted to the Tracker. Those (...) (14 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) Maybe we can replace them after all. Look at this picture: (URL) orange poles indicate the occurances of x606p01b.dat. They are all in undeveloped areas, so I think it's possible to replace them with other roadplates. /Tore (14 years ago, 3-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR