Subject:
|
Re: Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 May 2009 22:16:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8009 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > Hi gang,
> > I want to start by saying thanks to all those involved in creating parts and
> > managing the parts library. We toolsmiths would not have a job if it were'nt
> > for the LDraw parts library.
<snip>
>
> They just didn't quite make it into 2009-01, but I had to draw a line somewhen
> and concentrate on the update rather than certifying more parts.
>
> Would it help you to know that these should be released in 2009-02 sometime this
> summer?
>
> Chris
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the news. I should not be surprised that you are on top of this.
I understand the drawing the line in the sand. 2009-02 sounds great.
Thanks,
Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
| (...) Many of the Technic "beams" got re-cycled through the Parts Tracker in 2009-01 for primitive optimisation and BFC reasons. I took the opportunity to implement something that we had been talking about for some time - to name these types of (...) (15 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
