| |
In lugnet.cad, Matthew J. Chiles <mattchiles@gorge.net> wrote:
SNIP
> I've got another part (55423) in the system that has only 1 certify
> vote after almost 2 years (thank you Philo), and it is an extremely
> useful part that people actually need. Perhaps the reviewers are
> afraid to take the time - I know I would be if I were a reviewer. The
> stakes are too high with the way the bar is currently set - the
> commitment to properly review a part is hours per part.
>
> It would be better I think to look at the part from a wide angle and
> send it through... if there are no glaring errors probably nobody will
> ever notice them. If the little errors are ever a problem for anyone,
> then can be fixed later as they are noticed. But in the mean time
> there is another official part for people to use.
SNIP
Reviewing is not a big deal for most parts.
Please see a good (but not at the current stage) tutorial here:
http://www.l3go.bugge.com/articles/Reviewing-parts-tutorial.shtml
I am with you if you like to have more reviewers on the PT.
I also often read the sentence like "could benefit from using..." and a novote.
I feel that there should be made a certify or hold in that cases because if the
author don't correct his part within 3 month you can correct that error without
permission!
Often I had use this procedere to push some parts that had long time only such
messages.
cu
mikeheide
|
|
|
