 | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad, Dave Schuler wrote:
[snip]
> If this method seems silly to you, may I suggest that you not use it?
Bad choice of words "silly". Sorry about that, but he asked for a
"quick" way to do it. He used the word "quick" twice in fact. But
everyone seemed intent on providing a thorough, but complex method
without first telling the quick and dirty way. There are plenty of
newbies out there who don't know it.
Have fun,
Don
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Dave Schuler wrote:
> [snip]
> > If this method seems silly to you, may I suggest that you not use it?
>
> Bad choice of words "silly". Sorry about that, but he asked for a
> "quick" way to do it. He used the word "quick" twice in fact. But
> everyone seemed intent on providing a thorough, but complex method
> without first telling the quick and dirty way. There are plenty of
> newbies out there who don't know it.
Fair enough--I guess "quick" is in the eye of the beholder. 8^)
Dave!
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Dave Schuler wrote:
> [snip]
> > If this method seems silly to you, may I suggest that you not use it?
>
> Bad choice of words "silly". Sorry about that, but he asked for a
> "quick" way to do it. He used the word "quick" twice in fact. But
> everyone seemed intent on providing a thorough, but complex method
> without first telling the quick and dirty way. There are plenty of
> newbies out there who don't know it.
>
> Have fun,
>
> Don
I didn't necessarily mean quick, I meant easy. Hey, I'm lazy. ;-)
I like both answers because you gave me what I needed to know to accomplish the
task quickly, Dave gave me what I needed to know to understand what I'm doing!
Carl
| | | | | | |
