 | | Re: Dozen LEGO Roses —Terry Prosper
| | | | (...) What's the difference? (20 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Dozen LEGO Roses —John Neal
| | | | | (...) Mine design is more complicated. Compare these pics. The first pic is from a person who claims to have reversed engineered the original TLC rose. The second is mine: (2 URLs) As you can see, I made a better attempt to simulate more petals on (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Dozen LEGO Roses —David Koudys
| | | | | | (...) It's a beautiful job, John! I like yours better than the originals. Nicely done! I may, at some future time, try to 'reverse engineer' your roses ;) Take care, Dave (20 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Dozen LEGO Roses —John Neal
| | | | | | | (...) Thanks, Dave. (...) Ohh, sounds complicated:-) Here, I'll make your job easier: (4 URLs) I think these pics reveal the basic idea here. One note-- the interior ring of petals is being held by pressure between the sections of the "stem" (a Ross (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Dozen LEGO Roses —Terry Prosper
| | | | | (...) Ah! Indeed, yours are better. Terry (20 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | |
