 | | | | | |
While I haven’t changed my entry, I do have a more pleasing presentation:
Obviously, small portions dictate more helpings. Therefore, I present three
“Angel” Mechs--Garret, Munroe, and Duncan--acting as advanced scouts in what
appears to be an abandoned second-rate military base.
A few more photos are on my Flickr page.
By the way, I don’t want to sound like I’m brown-nosing here, but I have to say
that this contest was a great idea. Seeing so many terrific takes on the
original artwork was truly awe-inspiring.
Derek
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.build.mecha, Derek Schin wrote:
| |
While I haven’t changed my entry, I do have a more pleasing presentation:
Obviously, small portions dictate more helpings. Therefore, I present three
“Angel” Mechs--Garret, Munroe, and Duncan--acting as advanced scouts in what
appears to be an abandoned second-rate military base.
A few more photos are on my Flickr
page.
By the way, I don’t want to sound like I’m brown-nosing here, but I have to
say that this contest was a great idea. Seeing so many terrific takes on the
original artwork was truly awe-inspiring.
Derek
|
What, no Rogers mech? Where’s the love for Hack? Stupid brown-noser, you have
no chance to win!
-Your Dad
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.build.mecha, Keith Goldman wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build.mecha, Derek Schin wrote:
|
| |
What, no Rogers mech? Where’s the love for Hack? Stupid brown-noser, you
have no chance to win!
|
If I had more than three of these, then maybe
I’d have a few more Angels. By the way, some simple research shows that the
other three would be the Munroe II, Rogers, and Welles (not Hack...though I
admit that Hack would be a better name than Welles).
And it’s true that I have no chance to win, but let’s face it, I certainly made
good on my boast to build a better mech than you.
-Possibly your Dad (there were too many of us for me to be sure)
| | | | | | |
