To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.mechaOpen lugnet.build.mecha in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Mecha / 12149
12148  |  12150
Subject: 
Re: Stormwalker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:39:25 GMT
Viewed: 
812 times
  
In lugnet.build.mecha, Mark Neumann wrote:
   In lugnet.build.mecha, Marco Tagliaferri wrote:
   Here is the Stormwalker. Hope you like it
Marco

Yeah! I’ll say I like it.

First of all, Thank you for this. I really do feel honored hearing this from you. I found two pictures on the NET 9 month ago showing LEGO mecha. The first was the Black Mamba MKII (you may have seen it from time to time) and the second was the Rizmit by Eric Sophie.

   Cool, here goes my commentary:

*Wicked looking “mechwarrior style” battle mech
*Big beefy weapons
*Looks pretty darn cool
*Tandem Style cockpit
*Engine with folding cowling!
*Simple color scheme is good with yellow interior highights
-Feet are too small
-Body is too small (see my notes below)
-extra leg member in hip seems unneccesary

Let me guess. the body is the size it is because once you started building a body, you found Stormwalker wanted to fall over on a whim. In an effort to keep it standing, you lowered the center of gravity by shortening the height of the body. One way to counteract that “small body” is to enlongate and widen it. The lack of height is made up in bulk. Especially since you have wide hips going on there, the narrow body is also emphasized.


Sorry Mark, but you’re wrong. I thought of a fast attacking aggresive looking machine. Weight on the body would only be ballast. It is a bit tricky to get it to a stable stand. But if it’s once standing it is...

As I mentiond in my reply to Kyle I’m thinking of rebuilding the side beams to get more width (and space for weaponary).

   Do you find much wobbliness due to the foot size as well? Does a longer foot improve stabliliity? What is the reasoning for the second member in the hip? Is one inadequate for hip splay articulation?


I never tried larger feet on Stormwalker. Could be a good idea to give it some larger feet. So I could improve articulation.

The mystery of the second member in the hip:
The very first idea I had for Stormwalker was a hip looking like a “w”. I wanted the body to sit on the front in the middle. To achive this form I made several attemps and ended with a quadrupel geard hip. then I found one benefit of this construction, which kept me from stiffening the inner gears. It is possible to shift the point of gravity forward and back when needed to counteract the movement resulting from the leg positioning. Only the outer hip gears are needed to splay the feet.

   Dude, wow. I like it. It’s fun seeing your stuff as it comes out. (also, consider your risk as to a hippy status is completely removed.) ;)


Thank you Mark. Especially for the one in brackets...

   Build on! (and spotlighted)


Mark Neumann

The same to you! Build on!
I like it. It’s fun seeing your stuff as it comes out.

Marco

LUGNETer #2645



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Stormwalker
 
(...) Yeah! I'll say I like it. Cool, here goes my commentary: looking "mechwarrior style" battle mech beefy weapons pretty darn cool Style cockpit with folding cowling! color scheme is good with yellow interior highights -Feet are too small -Body (...) (19 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)

20 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR