To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / 15745
15744  |  15746
Subject: 
Re: butt-to-butt connections
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim
Date: 
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:55:29 GMT
Viewed: 
2955 times
  
In lugnet.build, Shaun Sullivan wrote:
   I’m soliciting solutions to a not-unfamiliar SNOT-construction quandry:

What’s the best way to attach brown bricks butt-end to butt-end (the ends opposite the studs) securely, using only brown pieces that are readily available (i.e. available in quanitity on Bricklink)?

The best solution I’ve come up with is to use these pieces periodically:



and then the two halves are secured together with some cross beams.

Any other ideas? The goal is to have a smooth surface on top, so the delicious technic plate (e.g. part 4263) mated to two 2x2 L-shaped plates (part 2420) won’t work as the technic plates have rounded edges. Technic pins leave little gaps, and 1x1 bricks with 3 studs aren’t produced in brown yet (are they?). Soooooo, let the brainstorming begin!

.s

What do you mean by ‘on top’? Are these butt-to-butt bricks supposed to form a flat surface, or upright walls with the studs facing out left and right, or a vertical wall with studs up and down? Can you handle sticking-out bits or studs on one side or the other?

The simplest thing I can think of is a line of 1x4 technic plates, each with a 2x2 plate on top. Then, join them together with 2x2 plates pushed into the holes upside down.

That way, you get a line of just one-plate thickness alternately two studs up and two studs down. But, it’s two-studs deep, so if you can’t hide that it’s no good.

Jason Railton



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: butt-to-butt connections
 
(...) I’m curious about the “studs-out” orientation as well. Either up-down or left-right (front-back). Each has their own particular spatial geometry, when talking about Lego brick. It would be help if you did something like the following (...) (19 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
  Re: butt-to-butt connections
 
"Jason J Railton" <j.j.railton@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:IByEKH.12Ln@lugnet.com... (...) 1x4 ***Technic*** plate?? What part # is that?? I have not come across a piece described as such in the catalog. Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde (19 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim)
  Re: butt-to-butt connections
 
(...) My best idea for doing this flush in a 1-brick thick wall is to make a line of headlight bricks, if you can get enough in brown. You alternate one upright, one face down, one upright, one face down, all pushed together. If the last one is (...) (19 years ago, 16-Feb-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  butt-to-butt connections
 
I'm soliciting solutions to a not-unfamiliar SNOT-construction quandry: What's the best way to attach brown bricks butt-end to butt-end (the ends opposite the studs) securely, using only brown pieces that are readily available (i.e. available in (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim, FTX) ! 

9 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR