| |
[ -> .org ]
Steve Bliss <steve.bliss@earthlink.net> wrote:
> This means that LEGOFan will need to provide these 'safeguards'. One
> idea we've discussed is to flag different areas (or whatever) as
> kid-appropriate (or not). Then members who are kids won't be able to
> access areas marked for adults. And maybe some adult members would
> appreciate the option to hide the 'kid areas'. ;)
So what would be available to not-logged-in users? Greatest common factor?
From a pragmatic standpoint, that seems like that'll dramatically chop the
usefulness of the site -- imagine if Google only showed Kid-Safe-Verified
sites unless you logged in.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
| (...) My understanding is that LEGO would like to have a site that they can feel comfortable sending traffic (kids and adults), but which they don't control and aren't responsible for. This site (LEGOFan) could include content (such as offsite (...) (20 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.publish, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.trains)
|
208 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
