Subject:
|
Re: PW validation (was: Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 19:07:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2524 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> Thanks for the above data points. How badly did it fail them by?
Pretty badly - I know they were all worthless. I didn't really pay attention
to the numbers. I think they were as low negatively, though, as the "first
leter from each word in a sentence" was positively, though.
> Did you catch this post from Monday?--
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=6459
Yep.
> What threshold number was below the all the number returned for the ones you
> tried that it failed? Would a threshold of, say, 50 (instead of the current
> 100) pass all of the ones that it's currently failing? Would a threshold of
> -100?
I think they were all < -100. Just tried one of them, and it was -138.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
