Subject:
|
Re: New feature: Article rating
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Mar 2000 16:27:50 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1774 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > To aid browsing, each news article now carries a rating in the range 0 • (low)
> > to 100 (high).
>
> ...just my opinion
>
> I think the score has little value without knowing how many people have read
> the post and have chosen not to vote - it could be argued (not by me) that
> these readers should register an automatic 50 score as they did not care
> either way?
Interesting idea. If the server knew who saw what, perhaps! But we're not there
yet I don't think, especially if we take news into account (and mail
subscriptions... how is the server to know whether some one pored over it or
deleted it unread). Good idea though, keep brainstorming, I say.
> Furthermore, while I acknowledge the system is still in its early days of
> use, I can't help thinking it is all very subjective. Take this post as an
> example :
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/market/auction/?n=5150
>
> It has a current score of 25 (one vote of nil):
> http://www.lugnet.com/news/rating-graph.cgi?lugnet.market.auction:5150
>
> I can see nothing wrong with it. I can't see why somebody has got worked up
> to vote nil for it?
Totally agree. I voted "nil" on yours that was a bare post of a broken URL and
no other information but I think to vote 0 for a post that is correctly placed,
jaunty in tone, brief but not too brief, and has a correctly functioning URL
seems wrong to me.
Personally, I enjoy Lindsay's auction posts and his auction listings, they're
fun. And he must be happy today as Michigan State made the final 4 in
basketball...
> Additionally, I think quoting anything more than the
> number of votes and the score is distracting.
can you clarify what you mean by this? I think the >> to tell you you voted on
something is useful.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) (low) (...) ...just my opinion I think the score has little value without knowing how many people have read the post and have chosen not to vote - it could be argued (not by me) that these readers should register an automatic 50 score as they (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
