|
 | | Re: Electronic brick (1968) schematics?
|
| (...) I've recently reverse-engineered the earlier unit from the 118 train set: Circuit: (2 URLs) would gladly do the same with a 139 unit if someone has one open. If anyone has a 139 unit but does not want to open it, please could they post the (...) (16 years ago, 13-Apr-10, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|  post, frequency (score: 1.433) |
|
 | | Question for the electronics experts
|
| Anyone know if it is possible to hack the Power Functions remotes & receivers to operate on a different 'band'? GMLTC is working on plans for our next club layout, and we might have seven operating loops. If we are running PF trains, we'll have some (...) (12 years ago, 3-Feb-15, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|   frequency (score: 1.251) |
|
| |
|   post, frequency (score: 1.246) |
|
 | | RE: RCX transmitting on the IR over 2400
|
| (...) 4800 baud is not always easy to achieve. Success is very dependent on what RCX vintage and which tower type you're using. Yo9u haven't mentioned what RCX programming system you're using and what is the message format you're using. If it is (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|   post, frequency (score: 1.177) |
|
 | | Re: R22 - swinging bots
|
| (...) Now, that's just rude. It may be appropriate, or even true, but I thought I'd point out the rudeness first. (...) OK, first, your obsessions (or insecurities?) are really creeping (nay, stampeding) into your post here. Second, do you mean two (...) (19 years ago, 15-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|   post, frequency (score: 1.162) |
|
 | | Re: Drive types
|
| (...) NXC is something like NQC and it is available for Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux platforms. While NXC is not yet complete, it is very functional with a large API for the NXT. Not eXactly C (NXC) is currently available in the form of NBC beta 20. (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|   post, frequency (score: 1.121) |
|
 | | Re: We'll just wave...
|
| (...) I'll take the bait. When we are forever secure from the possibility of tyranny, I'd be happy to see the Second Amendment repealed.[1] Til then, these tragedies are the price we pay. We should do everything we can to reduce the scope and (...) (14 years ago, 18-Dec-12, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|   frequency (score: 1.116) |
|
| |
|   frequency (score: 1.107) |
|
 | | Re: top poster statistics
|
| (...) Nope. But I know how to look for stuff, a valuable skill to cultivate here. The search box is your friend. start here: (URL) get reminded that the list is called "top 1000 noisemakers" which is a singularly un-useful name for it as it's not (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|   post, frequency (score: 1.106) |
|
| |
|   frequency (score: 1.099) |
|
| |
|   post, frequency (score: 1.026) |
|
 | | Re: Another missing message (was Re: Posts expiring?)
|
| (...) You have a very keen eye! That is interesting and ironic indeed! The post says the feature "was recently added" (past tense), which means that lugnet.announce:37 should have had that header inserted. In fact, #36 and #38 (before and after) (...) (2 months ago, 11-Jun-26, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|   post (score: 1.015) |
|
| |
|   post (score: 1.015) |
|
 | | Arcane technical history of LUGNET
|
| (...) That, or an insistent mind. ;-) (...) Yeah, this is what I was noticing earlier, that I thought might be a clue to the problem. (I now think it's a mirage, a nothing-burger.) "Recently added" turns out to be 9/30/98, two days after launch; (...) (2 months ago, 11-Jun-26, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|   post (score: 1.014) |
|
 | | Re: Posts expiring?
|
| (...) It's a pretty funny coincidence, actually. I'd been going over old archives of RTL(1) and then more recently LUGNET(2) as it came into being in 1998. At the same time, I happened to be chatting with Todd about something completely unrelated, (...) (2 months ago, 9-Jun-26, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|   post (score: 1.014) |
|
 | | Re: Motors comparison page updated
|
| (...) I have come across some industrial heater controls. To get the heaters at part power (to run them in a closed-loop temperature control), a method of burst firing is used. The circuit measures the zero crossings of the AC supply and turns the (...) (15 years ago, 25-Feb-11, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|   frequency (score: 1.002) |
|
| |
|   post, frequency (score: 0.995) |
|
 | | time sampling under the rcx standard OS
|
| Hi list, I'm trying to implement a position regulation (using a motor and a rotation sensor), using for instance a PID (Proportional-Integr...erivative) regulation. I tried to code it in NQC, using the standard OS, but it seems that the RCX loops at (...) (21 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|   post, frequency (score: 0.995) |
|
 | | Re: Motors comparison page updated
|
| (...) Good thing, the load is not inductive. (...) OK, with a 1 second cycle time, and pure on/off, it is simpler. All you need is a solid state relay. (...) Looks like some people do: (URL) and worse, most of these dimmers work by dissipating and (...) (16 years ago, 13-Jan-11, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.org.us.smart)
| |
|   frequency (score: 0.994) |
|
 | | Re: New Faction: The Bonktrons are coming.
|
| (...) Still wondering what contest Rosco was referring to when I called Richie on his previous trolling, starting to suspect a pattern, and wondering as to why the frequency of these trolls and mocks seems to be increasing, I decided to go look (...) (21 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| |
|   post, frequency (score: 0.992) |