|
 | | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| In lugnet.dear-lego, Todd Lehman writes: [snip] (...) For me, this hammers in why LUGNET is where I want to be. You notice that the forged posts were posted to USENET and not to here. I'll continue to read r.t.l, but I'm quite fond of having a stand (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
| 
brad, justus
(score: 4.216)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) greatly. (...) Heh. The five-year-old in my life got the huge Naboo Royal Starship toy for Christmas. I was impressed that Kenner (or whoever owns that name, now -- Hasbro?) toned the volume of the electronic noises it makes down a very quiet (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.216)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.209)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| (...) Why not? BO2K runs on Windows NT and Win2000 boxes. (The new version of Netbus does too, but I'm not sure if that's publicly available yet.) (...) But if you anticipate what packets the remote side will return, you can generate the appropriate (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| (...) Sure. But the issue isn't how it happened. The end net effect is the same -- it makes it easy to do something that's coming from someone else's box. (...) Again, true but probably not relevant -- such info certainly isn't in news server logs. (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) Why? That defeats the purpose of having LEGO for me! (...) Yes I do realize that, and I thank the TLC for allowing such databases to remain accessible to the public. (...) So we are supposed to fall over like little "yes men"? If we don't like (...) (24 years ago, 25-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) I honestly don't think his comment there deserved the harsh reply. Not trying to jump on you, but I just see [his comment] as simple sarcasm used in the context of a flame message alone. I would assume that people here at Lugnet would know we (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) trying (...) Yes, I see. (...) True, true. But for the most part a lot of us in cad were just too ticked off at him to see that. Besides, it gave me some practice :) Anyways, he's improved greatly since the whole CFV thing that almost had him (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) Can you get in touch with him about this? I sent him a message but given the ficle nature of my ISP when connecting to riso.dk/ldraw.org.etc I do not know if it got through. I am not sure whether I used the right address either. (24 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Brad Justus...
|
| ...and the long silence. ::sigh:: Interesting how he showed up just in time to deflect some sort of actual public statement on our part against the TLC, and just before the demise of S@H Canada and the end of parts packs in the U.S. And summer seems (...) (24 years ago, 15-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus...
|
| (...) I agree! What is more, we haven't heard from him in a while? Patience is Ok, but some reply would be appropriate after this amount of time. At least some information. Sincerely, Doyle (24 years ago, 15-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus...
|
| One of the totally ridiculous parts of all this is that Consumer Affairs, if not ALL of TLC... DON'T USE THE PART NUMBERS MOLDED INTO THE PARTS! If you call CA and try to point them to the right part by giving them the part #, they can't look it up (...) (24 years ago, 16-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus...
|
| (...) the (...) I'm sorry, I wrote the letter late, I have a few more details to relay. Yes they did have limited quanities on most of the accessories and thats why the put limited, but to my knowledge of what was explained, it wasn't to indicate (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus...
|
| (...) Let em charge whatever they want and implement whatever kind of minimum quantity policies as well. They'll keep true fanatics happy and they'll keep the parts auction crowd in business redistributing to smaller buyers. (24 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 4.205)
|
