|
 | | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| In lugnet.dear-lego, Todd Lehman writes: [snip] (...) For me, this hammers in why LUGNET is where I want to be. You notice that the forged posts were posted to USENET and not to here. I'll continue to read r.t.l, but I'm quite fond of having a stand (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
| 
brad, justus
(score: 3.548)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) greatly. (...) Heh. The five-year-old in my life got the huge Naboo Royal Starship toy for Christmas. I was impressed that Kenner (or whoever owns that name, now -- Hasbro?) toned the volume of the electronic noises it makes down a very quiet (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.540)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| (...) Why not? BO2K runs on Windows NT and Win2000 boxes. (The new version of Netbus does too, but I'm not sure if that's publicly available yet.) (...) But if you anticipate what packets the remote side will return, you can generate the appropriate (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.538)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| (...) Sure. But the issue isn't how it happened. The end net effect is the same -- it makes it easy to do something that's coming from someone else's box. (...) Again, true but probably not relevant -- such info certainly isn't in news server logs. (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.538)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.534)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) Why? That defeats the purpose of having LEGO for me! (...) Yes I do realize that, and I thank the TLC for allowing such databases to remain accessible to the public. (...) So we are supposed to fall over like little "yes men"? If we don't like (...) (24 years ago, 25-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.534)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) I honestly don't think his comment there deserved the harsh reply. Not trying to jump on you, but I just see [his comment] as simple sarcasm used in the context of a flame message alone. I would assume that people here at Lugnet would know we (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.532)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) trying (...) Yes, I see. (...) True, true. But for the most part a lot of us in cad were just too ticked off at him to see that. Besides, it gave me some practice :) Anyways, he's improved greatly since the whole CFV thing that almost had him (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.532)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.531)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.531)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) Can you get in touch with him about this? I sent him a message but given the ficle nature of my ISP when connecting to riso.dk/ldraw.org.etc I do not know if it got through. I am not sure whether I used the right address either. (24 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.531)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| (...) Actually, no, it's not possible to effectively forge messages here. Yes, you can post messages using someone else's name (easily, even). But it is _not_ possible to forge the originating IP in Todd's logs. Which means that even though _we_ (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.530)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| (...) Point 1, he uses IE on Windows NT (if we can believe the first message, at least). So no remote breaking in. Which leaves physical access - which is IMHO rather unlikely. (...) Break into a high-security FreeBSD box? Highly unlikely, (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.530)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| (...) Maybe a flag to specify normal or detailed header info? There's more than just IP addresses in that-thar header. *I'd* like to see the followup-to header given higher visibility Steve (24 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.530)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| Moving this to .debate, for lack of lugnet.off-topic.comp.risks. (...) BO isn't cracking - it's carelessness on the part of the crackee. Anyone can distribute happy99.exe, but breaking root on an up-to-CERT unix box is something very few can do. (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.530)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.525)
|
|
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.524)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) It probably was sarcasm, but I still see it as highly inappropriate. Like using your cellular during church service at the Notre Dame de Paris or at the St Peter of Rome. (...) I agree. But why bother flaming the clueless ones? They don't (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.523)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| [could have posted this to .fun, it belongs in .rant, but whatever...] (...) You could have stopped after 'service'. Or any other public gathering/performance. Inconsiderate users of noisy devices bother me greatly. Especially the ones that are (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.522)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?
|
| (...) Yeah. When in doubt, I usually go for thread cohesion over directing it every which newsgroup - and I was in doubt. (...) Oh, yes, I could have. But that wouldn't have been _bad_ enough to compare with whatever it was I was comparing to. (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
brad, justus
(score: 3.522)
|
