| | Re: More 2001 Star Wars, Studios, and LOM
|
|
(...) The $10 range is right. It definitely makes the set worthwhile! J (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
|
| | Re: More 2001 Star Wars, Studios, and LOM
|
|
Are you sure that the AT-ST is only $9.97? That seems pretty reasonable for that set. I woudl have expected more like $15 or $20. Kevin McMillin <mcmillins@prodigy.net> wrote in message news:G5sG8J.G8s@lugnet.com... (...) (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
|
| | Re: new color: grey-green? (was "Just got 7311")
|
|
(...) Rilly? I thought they were calling it "Grease Green", or something... Steve (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
| | Re: new color: grey-green? (was "Just got 7311")
|
|
(...) Just so we're all on the same page here, Steve's initial post was facetious. I suspect Frank and Franklin are aware of this, but a late-joiner might think a new, serious discussion of the color was springing up again... Dave! (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
| | Re: new color: grey-green? (was "Just got 7311")
|
|
(...) Yup, its the "New Green" in the Statue of Liberty. (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
| | new color: grey-green? (was "Just got 7311")
|
|
(...) IIRC, someone posted a message saying that LegoCo officially calls this new color "Sand Green". IIRC, this new color is also the color of the big Statue of Liberty set. Franklin (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
| | Re: Just got 7311
|
|
(...) I don't know if it has an official name yet, but If you really can't wait, you can mix two colors in LDraw to make a new color. This often doesn't return great results, but it's worth a try. The formula for mixed colors is: M = 256 + A * 16 + (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
| | Just got 7311
|
|
Wow, I just picked up my first Life on Mars set, #7311 Red Planet Cruiser. Pretty cool. But what is up with that bizarre gray-green color? Does that have a name, or what? Steve "gdr" Bliss (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
| | Re: Cheap small Studios sets at Zellers
|
|
(...) cheap (...) I bought a Cameraman at Wal-Mart in London, ON for Can$2.77. I got one at Zellers for Can$2.54. They had a ton--this was Monday, 18 Dec. Zellers in Windsor, ON also has a 15% off LEGO sale posted. best Lindsay (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
| | 2001 Star Wars in TRU
|
|
I was in TRU (Cary NC) today, they now have plenty of the 2001 Star Wars. FUT: lugnet.market.shopping Frank (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.loc.us.nc)
|
|
| | More 2001 Star Wars, Studios, and LOM
|
|
Hi all; Found some more Star Wars at Wal-Mart in Ottumwa, IA. <set:7127 7127 AT-ST> was $9.97 USD <set:7126 7126 Battle Droid Carrier> was $9.97 USD <set:7106 7106 Droid Escape> was $6.77 USD <set:7166 7166 Imperial Shuttle> was $34.88 USD Studios: (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
|
| | Re: Cheap small Studios sets at Zellers
|
|
(...) (looks at parts) 1x black cap 1x Steven Speilberg minifig upper body 1x grey megaphone 1x 2*2 black tile with director's clipboard printing 1x 2*1 black tile with director's clipboard printing 1x 2*1*2*1 black hinge plate 2x black minifig (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
| | Re: Cheap small Studios sets at Zellers
|
|
(...) It is 2.99cnd at Zellers. I expect it will stay that way. (...) Actually, it started out at 3.49$. Last week when I came to buy another at that price, Zellers had boosted the price to 4.99$. It will probably remain 4.99. (Unfortunately :-( ) (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
| | Cheap small Studios sets at Zellers
|
|
Does anyone now more about this? <set:1357 Cameraman> is listed as $4 USD. I am certain that I have seen it for $2.99 CDN at Zellers. <set:1356 Stuntman Catapult> is also listed as $4 USD. It's $3.49 CDN at Zellers. These prices are about half of (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Racers now at shop.lego.com
|
|
(...) Well, remember that "age range" is kind of misleading. Rather than chronological age, the important one is level of development - physical, mental, and even emotional. So there may be a market for kids who are "too old" for Duplo, but who (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is scaring me...
|
|
(...) Indeed. Assuming TLC solves the "license one person's design so others can order it" problem in a way that makes it attractive for designers to contribute, and in a way that makes it easy for consumers to find "the good stuff". Some people (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Racers now at shop.lego.com
|
|
(...) Well, remember that "age range" is kind of misleading. Rather than chronological age, the important one is level of development - physical, mental, and even emotional. So there may be a market for kids who are "too old" for Duplo, but who (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Racers now at shop.lego.com
|
|
Jake McKee wrote in message ... (...) The age range on these sets is 4-9. That's hardly too young for System. Even now, many *Technic* sets ag range start below 9. Kevin (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Racers now at shop.lego.com
|
|
(...) How about, "You'll shoot your eye out!" Best wishes, Aaron (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Racers now at shop.lego.com
|
|
(...) But I like wishing for bad things... It makes my life more fulfilled :o) I disagree with the logic here, juniorization was begun by TLC because kids have shorter attention spans for completing tasks (mostly due to the video game craze). I (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|