 | | Re: Battlestar Galactica on Mars?
|
|
So far I love the little martian sets.. the mechs are wonderful. But I'm finding that I'm having a hard time bringing myself to spend $50 and $90 for the larger sets when they don't look terribly interesting. Does anyone have an opinion on them? (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | TLC re-releasing discontinued LEGO Duplo set!
|
|
Hi all, although we shouldn't be optimistic becuase the small fact I found out today, I still can't wait to tell you about it! Today, I *might* have found the very first re-released discontinued set ever. It's nothing important IMHO as it's been (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo) !
|
| |
| | Re: Battlestar Galactica on Mars?
|
|
(...) Hm, sadly, I think he's mistaken. Pollux comes in the big $50 mech, but the C-alien with him isn't Castor. (I think it's Canopus.) I remember wondering if Castor was going to be in one of the other sets... J (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Battlestar Galactica on Mars?
|
|
There is a Centauri, he comes with the red planet protector if I remember right. Box is downstairs, he's on my desk, too lazy to get up and look this late.. "jon furman" <rambocalrissian@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G5FDpB.MC9@lugnet.com... (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Battlestar Galactica on Mars?
|
|
(...) Well, now I know what set I'll have to buy myself to celebrate my birthday (June 18). Steve "Gemini" Bliss (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Battlestar Galactica on Mars?
|
|
(...) Oh, of course... absolutely. I'd love to see names that were completely invented words with no 'earthling' equivlant.. However the naming scheme they chose could be interpreted in two acceptible ways that I see: 1) They're named after those (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Battlestar Galactica on Mars?
|
|
(...) Actually, so is Centauri... though I suppose that's open to interpretation. :) Alpha Cetauri (a binary star) + Proxima Centauri = trinary system perhaps? -- -Bones- "Being Optimized for Nocturnal Exploration and Sabotage" = (URL) = NecroBones (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) Perhaps unfortunately the same can be said of Lord of the Rings. I have much higher expectations of that since it probably also has the budget and background to make a much more serious effort. John #388 (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) Taste is, of course, an individual matter, but since the movie was attempting to be about D&D, it was beholden in large measure to the spirit of the game. As you yourself point out, the "writer" never played the game, so right out of the (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) <snip> Blah, blah, blah. I will freely admit it wasn't the best movie in the world. But I had a really good time at the movies that night, and it wasn't *in spite* of the movie I saw, it was because of it (and, having seen both Bats and (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
