 | | Re: Battlestar Galactica on Mars?
|
|
(...) Oh, of course... absolutely. I'd love to see names that were completely invented words with no 'earthling' equivlant.. However the naming scheme they chose could be interpreted in two acceptible ways that I see: 1) They're named after those (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Battlestar Galactica on Mars?
|
|
(...) Actually, so is Centauri... though I suppose that's open to interpretation. :) Alpha Cetauri (a binary star) + Proxima Centauri = trinary system perhaps? -- -Bones- "Being Optimized for Nocturnal Exploration and Sabotage" = (URL) = NecroBones (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) Perhaps unfortunately the same can be said of Lord of the Rings. I have much higher expectations of that since it probably also has the budget and background to make a much more serious effort. John #388 (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) Taste is, of course, an individual matter, but since the movie was attempting to be about D&D, it was beholden in large measure to the spirit of the game. As you yourself point out, the "writer" never played the game, so right out of the (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) <snip> Blah, blah, blah. I will freely admit it wasn't the best movie in the world. But I had a really good time at the movies that night, and it wasn't *in spite* of the movie I saw, it was because of it (and, having seen both Bats and (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
