 | | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) A movie like that really has big shoes to fill, since it's competing against the imagination of millions (?) over 25+ years! Anything they tried would be bound to disappoint some viewers, I suppose, but I'm glad to hear it wasn't too bad... (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
|
|
(...) Not bad- FARTs. That could work. Or how about Weak Tiny Figures? (I'm still attached to "suckifigs", though.) (...) Agreed. (...) Good point... but it begs the question: If you really want your aliens to look different then why do they have 2 (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) I'd have to say in the movie. Yes, I've seen better, but it wasn't bad. eric (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) Were the special effects better in the movie or in the Lego trailer? Dave! (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
Hey all.... (I am placing this in lugnet.year.2001 only because there is no lugnet.studios group- since it's moved into a full-blown theme, should there be one?) I went to the movies on Saturday night to see "Dungeons and Dragons". Before the movie (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
