 | | Re: new Technic product shown!
|
|
(...) You are completely right about the Prop Plane <set:8855>. Not only is it the the best Technic plane but it may be the best Technic set period. It is only 1 of 2 sets in my opinion that are perfect in both form and function. The prop assembly (...) (24 years ago, 9-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: new Technic product shown!
|
|
(...) 8425 and 8836? Nah - the best Technic plane is <set:8855> IMO I'll bet you a Technic piece of your choice that you won't be able to order the parts for THAT one. That prop attached to a gear piece has to be one of the most rare pieces going. (...) (24 years ago, 9-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | 2001 Cleveland Sighting
|
|
Target has all the new Star Wars sets (I picked up the AT-ST today), and the smallest 3 LoM sets. They may have had more LoM sets that sold, but I didn't see any price tags for them. I'm considering buying the $50 Podrace/Lightsaber Duel/Droid (...) (24 years ago, 8-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: aslo: new Technic product shown!
|
|
Christian Gemuenden wrote in message ... (...) Because most of us couldn't care less about yet another fighting machine series? Kevin (24 years ago, 8-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: new Technic product shown!
|
|
"Christian Gemuenden" <GECH1@t-online.de> wrote in message news:G5985A.8z7@lugnet.com... (...) I guess it's becoming harder and harder for those LEGO guys to come up with another car, another heli, another tractor, another..... Maybe with ZNAP going (...) (24 years ago, 8-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | aslo: new Technic product shown!
|
|
Hi! I wonder why so far nobody has mentioned the new LEGO Technic product that is shown in one of the large pictures of the photo gallery. Looks like we will get more Cyberslam-like stuff later this year. I copied the relevant images into the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter LEGO- what happened?
|
|
(...) Well, actually, that's not really the secret ending. Won't say any more. Finish the books, and you'll see what I mean. (...) Yep, it'll be different. But maybe it won't be juniorized. (nah) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this a possibility?...
|
|
(...) That's a great idea!!!! One member of each Lego group should appoint a member to be responsible for this (Title of Position: internal and external relations officer). This concept has applications for national trading as well. I live in (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.year.2000, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter LEGO- what happened?
|
|
Also, a main reason for the perhaps "targeted age bracket" of book>4 could have something to do with the fact there's a death of a boy, age 17, (...) Thanks for giving away the secret ending. Here I am in the middle of the third book, looking (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter LEGO- what happened?
|
|
(...) Well, actually, he was 10 (turning 11) in the first book and 14 in the fourth. Also, a main reason for the perhaps "targeted age bracket" of book 4 could have something to do with the fact there's a death of a boy, age 17, at the end. It'll be (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.year.2002)
|
