 | | Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
|
|
(...) You miss the point. I am talking about a name for the whole class of figs, which would include martians, battle droids, and whatever else Lego comes out with in the future that uses this construction style. (...) I'm OK with the look of the (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: My thoughts on the 2001 sets (Life on Mars and LEGO Studios)
|
|
Looking at the catalog pic of the new LoM set, it appears that the pnuematic thing sends Martian figures through the tubes to the stations. It also looks like the tan station from 7316 fits on the end of one of the tubes. I'm wondering if 7313 and (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
|
|
(...) Well, thats good to hear, but why must they be fuzed! I guess the little kiddies would break 'em... ;-) </Kyle> AIM: legomankyle or KyleKeppler ___...___ High Velocity LEGO: (URL) chat: (URL) Industries: (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
|
|
(...) Yeah. How about: Martians I actually have been meaning to post that after getting all the LoM sets (apart from the big base, which no one seems to have found yet) I quite like the martians, which surprises me, because frankly I expected to (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | will CAD for Lego...
|
|
(...) If someone were to loan me THIS PIECE: "(URL) would be happy to encode it into a DAT file for use with LDraw/LEdit/MLCAD/(etc.). :-) Thanks, Franklin (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
